Anatomy of Deception

Anatomy of Deception


What a good book!  The Anatomy of Deception by Lawrence Goldstone takes the best parts of The Bone Garden by Tess Gerritsen (the medical history), and makes it an entire suspense novel.  The Anatomy of Deception is set in the late 1880’s Philadelphia and told by young medical student Ephraim Carroll.  Fictional Carroll is learning from the true man considered to be the instigator of modern medicine, William Osler.  Here they spend their days, along with other medical students, performing autopsies (now newly legalized), and examining patients.  One day, Carroll’s suspicions are peaked when Osler mysteriously refuses to autopsy a beautiful woman who comes across his  table.  When a fellow student dies of apparent cholera, which is later found to be poisoning, Carroll begins to suspect a sinister link, and he risks losing a new position at Johns Hopkins to discover the truth.

This book was, from what I know about the history of medicine, very accurate.  It was also exciting and unique.  Several of the characters actually existed, and the fictionalized ones were so well-rounded that you would think they had.  The mystery is complex and intriguing, and while occasionally I became frustrated with Carroll’s naivety, the book was a perfect combination of history, gore, mystery, death, revenge, and absolution.  I can’t recommend this book more to those with interests in medicine, history, or even just suspense.


Try The Anatomy of Deception if you liked the historical medical thriller The Bone Garden by Tess Gerristen, or the biography of John Hunter by Wendy Moore called The Knife Man.

This entry was posted in Book Reviews, General Fiction and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Anatomy of Deception

  1. Lawrence Goldstone says:

    Thanks, Sadie, for the kind words. I spent a lot of time getting the medicine and surgery right, so I’m thrilled you liked that part. Believe me, there is nothing better for a writer than to create the kind of experience for a reader that you seemed to have had. As to Ephraim’s innocence–I tried to fashion a man of his time, not simply a 21st century throwback. I’ve read a lot of 19th century novels and he is hardly unsophisticated by comparison. Sometimes I wanted to shake him by the shoulders too, but a character, once drawn, has to remain true.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s